|
Feature
Article:The PLM Universe
We dislike TLA's (Three Letter Acronyms - even
though we are just as guilty as anyone of using them) and express
dismay at the haphazard way in which terms like PLM are used by
the various vendors. We regard PLM as a concept, not a product to
be sold; we prefer to use the term Engineering Applications.

This Universe includes overlapping application
areas:
CAx = Computer Aided Design, Computer Aided Manufacture
& Computer Aided Engineering
PDM = Product Data Management
EDM = Engineering Document Management
GIS = Geographic Information Systems and Mapping (part of)
EDA = Electronic Design Automation (small part of)
Many vendors use PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) to describe
their combined CAx and PDM/EDM offerings, whilst others will include
all or some of the above overlapping application areas as PLM. Enterprise
Applications vendors also offer PLM, but we would classify most
as downstream of the design process, where design has already been
fixed. Some vendors do nothing other than pure-play PDM and EDM;
others integrate these products with other specific business systems
like Enterprise Resource Planning or Content Management. In our
view, PLM functions are a sub-set of both Engineering and Enterprise
applications.
CAx and PDM/EDM
The graphic above provides a visualisation of
the definition of this Universe from an applications perspective.
Using this definition, Cambashi focuses on groups of vendors in
these key areas to build a picture of the universe and develop market
sizing data. We have reported on the overall Engineering Applications
market in our previous Web-article; we now look at the Product Data
and Engineering Document Management and CAx parts separately. (Note:
the GIS revenues of CAx players have not been separated from CAx
revenue estimates).
| Growth in US$ terms: |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006f |
| Engineering Applications |
5.00% |
14.30% |
14.80% |
7.00% |
| PDM & EDM |
6.10% |
15.00% |
5.20% |
5.30% |
| CAx |
5.70% |
15.60% |
12.50% |
9.20% |
PDM/EDM
Despite a lot of media promotion, growth in the
PDM/EDM market remained lower than that in the CAX market in 2005
- see above. Although there has been an undoubted increase in the
number of PDM/EDM applications in use, this has been tempered by
the replacement of older implementations by lower-cost systems that
attract less maintenance and implementation revenues. Hosted systems
and on-demand web-based solutions are gaining traction in the market
and are starting to present real choice for users as they offer
attractive alternatives to owning and managing non-core IT functions.
Hence, Cambashi sees lower than generally expected revenue growth
in PDM/EDM. One factor which holds back this growth is the essentially
flat performance of mySAP PLM, which led the way as a provider when
it entered the market. Other vendors in this space have embarked
on strategic or technical acquisitions to grow - Agile and Eigner;
Dassault and MatrixOne for instance. Even without SAP, the market
would have shown only slightly higher growth at 7% in 2005.
Note: We have used the same scale on the PDM/EDM
applications graph as in the selected CAx vendors below to allow
true comparison of revenues.
CAx
In contrast, the CAx portion of the market
grew at double-digit rates in 2005, following an equally good year
in 2004. The marketing and sales execution of CAx players has improved
significantly in this period. End-of-life programs, upgrade and
replacement offers have kept prices competitive and made it cheaper
for existing customers to move to new platforms and applications,
whilst maintaining investments in staff and data. Management of
partnerships and channels is becoming a key area again, as much
of the growth exhibited in the CAx market is driven by small and
medium businesses (SMB's) which are uneconomic direct sales targets.
With a couple of profitable years behind them, CAx vendors are also
on the acquisition trail, though they are now generally looking
for smaller acquisitions that fill technology or installed-base
gaps in their portfolios, rather than those that increase revenue
or bottom-line contributions. Autodesk and Alias; Dassault and ABAQUS;
or Bentley Systems with REI and RAM International; AVEVA with Tribon;
Ansys and Fluent are all examples..

Looking forward
Overall, we see that, whilst new 3D and especially
task-specific CAx applications are now being accepted in the market,
PDM/EDM remains an area that users are still unsure of. We expect
growth in CAx to continue in 2006, but at a slightly lower rate
of around 10%, compared to 2005. Areas that are attracting interest
are simulation and analysis and emerging territories like EU Accession
States and former Soviet Bloc members, plus China, India and South
America, as these economies take on manufacturing from the developed
economies of the West.
PDM/EDM will continue to grow. At the lowest level
- simple document vaulting in the design office - acceptance of
some sort of document management is gaining ground in smaller accounts,
though low-cost or free tools (included with CAx) continue to dominate
this market. On-line and on-demand/pay-for-use systems which extend
and control the use of design information throughout project teams
are also gaining customers, particularly in large-scale civil and
architectural engineering companies. Here the emphasis is on leveraging
design information for costing and planning purposes. With prospects
still somewhat confused on what to expect from these technologies,
we see growth of only half that in CAx for 2006 - 5% to 6%.
Nick
Ballard
back to top
Also in this issue . . . .
Cambashi researches best practice
and assists IT suppliers in best practice implementation. For more
information on Cambashi services please email info@cambashi.com
To subscribe: send an email with
the word "subscribe" in the subject line to: ezine@cambashi.com
© Copyright 2006 Cambashi Ltd
back to top
|